Hi Ian,
Yes the rear is raised a little. However, this would also raise the overflow tube, as it is a little further to the rear of the chaincase midpoint so less oil should have overflowed. I measured the gap between the rear tyre and deck at 18mm. Without the wood, the rear tyre almost touches the deck. This would make a small difference to the volume of oil retained, but my guess is only a few mls.
Certainly with a rider on board and rear suspension compressed would alter it further. All this would tilt the chaincase backwards, oil would move backwards, and increase the overflow volume even more. The oil would contact the chainwheel (clutch sprocket) more readily.
I marked the oval at chain bottom to see how high up the oval (see photo attached) the oil is needed, as you can see the oil level on the oval by looking down through the filler hole. The chain seems to be above the oil level I observed before in the Inset photo. But the slack is also at the bottom when running, so chain dips down further than indicated. (I pushed down on the top chain run to get the bottom straight for the photo).
Presumably, BSA would have assumed that any work on the chaincase would be on the centrestand, so may have thought that oil levels observed on the stand are not relevant to the chain level at bottom of the chainwheel.? So I think all is OK for 225mls. *conf2*ing?
Col