Author Topic: Carb conundrum  (Read 4701 times)

Offline GoldenFailure

  • Moving Up
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 33
  • Karma: 0
  • Wales
Carb conundrum
« on: 21.12. 2011 19:59 »
Hi everyone. I just bought a 1955 ish Golden Flash, barely running and in a bit of a state. My main problem is the carb, its an old Mk 1 Concentric, when it should be a pre mono 276 or mono 376 I think? Anyway, I cant afford to change it just yet, and was wondering if anyone could advise me how to set it up?

At the moment -

626 Amal Mk1 Concenetric
25 pilot
106 needle jet and needle with four identifying grooves (both borrowed from a Mk1 932)
Needle in richest groove (1st from taper)
210 main jet (naughtily drilled out from 1mm to 1.2mm)
3.5 Slide

On one mile test runs followed by plug checks

Starts first kick, idles a bit rough

30mph runs lumpy, plugs black and sooty
40mph runs better, plugs still sooty
45mph feels good, plugs starting to burn white
50mph - 60mph still pulls well, but plugs are scary white
runs out of guts at 70mph

Ive tinkered with the pilot screw to no avail, and put the original, shorter needle and needle jet in, but with these its near impossible to start and will only run with air slide down, so put 932 needle/jet back in.

I would really appreciate any advice, I cant afford to buy endless jets and slides, or a new carb, and although Ive rebuilt a couple of engines, setting up carbs still confuses me.
1955 Plunger Golden Flash (doesn't work)
1967-2005  Enfield Bullet bitsa (evil)
Absence of common sense or car to go with it.

Online trevinoz

  • Newcastle, N.S.W. Australia.
  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 3238
  • Karma: 71
Re: Carb conundrum
« Reply #1 on: 21.12. 2011 20:23 »
Are you mixing up very early concentric components with later ones?
The first concentric had a short needle and a short jet holder.
The modified form is a jet holder which places the main jet deeper into the bowl.
The first ones had a pilot jet screwed into the bottom of the body but was changed to a drilling in the pilot passage.
It seems as though you might have the passage pilot which is blocked.
Tkae out the air sdrew and poke a fine wire through the drilling.
A bit difficult to get at but when it is clear you will be able to squirt some fluid through the pilot and see it come out through the bottom of the body.
If you have a swinging arm bike, you should have a 1-1/16" monobloc and if plunger, 276.
 Trev.

Offline GoldenFailure

  • Moving Up
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 33
  • Karma: 0
  • Wales
Re: Carb conundrum
« Reply #2 on: 21.12. 2011 21:15 »
Hi Trev, thanks for your response. Yes, I'm mixing parts, only way I could get it working. I read about the different needle and holder, but bizarrely the holders were the same length (I had an old 932 Ive been cannibalizing) Ive blown all the passages and jets out with compressed air, but I'll try unscrewing and poking it with wire, but surely that would only explain the richness (and would it? wouldn't the pilot being blocked make it leaner?) and not the later lean ness? The pilot is a screw in affair, and the bike is a plunger, do the engines differ? (in a carburation requirement sense)
1955 Plunger Golden Flash (doesn't work)
1967-2005  Enfield Bullet bitsa (evil)
Absence of common sense or car to go with it.

Offline jfligg

  • Valued Contributor
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2006
  • Posts: 268
  • Karma: 1
Re: Carb conundrum
« Reply #3 on: 22.12. 2011 00:51 »
Hello Have you measured the float hieght?  Jeff

Online Triton Thrasher

  • Scotland
  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 2004
  • Karma: 23
Re: Carb conundrum
« Reply #4 on: 22.12. 2011 07:59 »
Do the Amal procedure as is found in manuals.

Forget mph and concentrate on throttle openings.

Idle, full throttle (main jet), 2/3 throttle (needle position), 1/4 thottle(slide cutaway), idle again. Use a new needle and needle jet.

Get each circuit too rich then correct.

Offline iansoady

  • Valued Contributor
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 471
  • Karma: 9
Re: Carb conundrum
« Reply #5 on: 22.12. 2011 14:09 »
A 626 would be a bit on the small side (just over 1" bore) so it'll be difficult to get everything right. The 32mm would have been closer I would have thought.

Symptoms sound as though it's rich on needle / cutaway then weakening out. I'd echo what Triton Thrasher suggests to try to eliminate the problem. Unfortunately with carbs it does tend to be a process of substitution to get things right.
Ian.
1962 Golden Flash (arrived)
1955 Velo Viper/Venom (departed)
2004 Triumph Tiger 955i (staying)

Offline ebsbury

  • Active
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 14
  • Karma: 0
  • 57 A7SS
Re: Carb conundrum
« Reply #6 on: 23.12. 2011 21:51 »
The original carb is 1 1/16" so 26mm is a little small. If the carburetters is too small it will be likely to run out of steam at the top end but should run well at lower speeds.

What is stamped on the side of the carb. There are lots of old 26mm Triple carbs around that cause rich running on other bikes. Ther's an article here that can help sort out what bits and pieces are in the carb: http://www.amalcarb.co.uk/TechnicalDetail.aspx?id=11

You can download the Amal Tuning leaflet from the same site.

Online Triton Thrasher

  • Scotland
  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 2004
  • Karma: 23
Re: Carb conundrum
« Reply #7 on: 24.12. 2011 11:48 »


What is stamped on the side of the carb. There are lots of old 26mm Triple carbs around that cause rich running on other bikes. Ther's an article here that can help sort out what bits and pieces are in the carb: http://www.amalcarb.co.uk/TechnicalDetail.aspx?id=11

You can download the Amal Tuning leaflet from the same site.

The Triumph and BSA Triple carbs I've seen were 27mm, which is pretty exactly inch and a sixteenth. 28mm is the commonest metric replacement used for that.

If inch and a sixteenth is correct, then 30mm is probably too big for best performance and flexibility and 32mm is really too big.

Offline GoldenFailure

  • Moving Up
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 33
  • Karma: 0
  • Wales
Re: Carb conundrum
« Reply #8 on: 24.12. 2011 15:53 »
Thanks for all your responses.

Theres nothing stamped on the side apart from 626, I know what you mean, the old 932 has additional numbers, but this doesn't.

Thanks for the link to the amal carb technical page, but thats what I was using to describe the parts in my original post.

Ive removed the pilot jet and air screw, cleaned and replaced and its made no change.

I understand that if I replace needles and jets its unlikely to be perfect first time, but its so crazily wrong right now I'm not sure where to begin.

Does anyone know (or know where I can find out) what the correct jets, needle and slide should be used on the 376 and whether they should be proportionately increased or decreased to create similar fueling in the 626?

With my exceptionally limited finances I'm not sure where to start, and I'm kicking myself for swapping 2 working bikes for a bloody great paperweight! 
1955 Plunger Golden Flash (doesn't work)
1967-2005  Enfield Bullet bitsa (evil)
Absence of common sense or car to go with it.

Offline ebsbury

  • Active
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 14
  • Karma: 0
  • 57 A7SS
Re: Carb conundrum
« Reply #9 on: 24.12. 2011 20:46 »
An 1 /16" Monobloc on a Gold Flash of that era came stock with a 240 Main Jet, 25 Pilot Jet, 106 Needle Jet, and a 3 1/2 cutaway. As a general rule to convert from Monobloc to Concentric reduce the size of the Main Jet by 20% and leave the other settings unchanged.

Presumable the pilot bush has been removed as you have a 25 Pilot jet fitted.

The needle you are using with the four inscribed rings is a lean needle usually found on later 850 Commandos.

Offline iansoady

  • Valued Contributor
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 471
  • Karma: 9
Re: Carb conundrum
« Reply #10 on: 25.12. 2011 12:12 »

The needle you are using with the four inscribed rings is a lean needle usually found on later 850 Commandos.

The Commando uses a 900 series carb whereas the 26mm will be a 600. ISTR that the needles are different between the 2 ranges (but my memory isn't what it was).
Ian.
1962 Golden Flash (arrived)
1955 Velo Viper/Venom (departed)
2004 Triumph Tiger 955i (staying)

Offline GoldenFailure

  • Moving Up
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 33
  • Karma: 0
  • Wales
Re: Carb conundrum
« Reply #11 on: 30.12. 2011 15:03 »
Hi all.

I just replaced the needle with the correct one, and it was a different length and taper. But its had no effect. Even on the richest needle groove position, with the recommended 106 needle jet, 230 ish main and with the idle screw correctly adjusted, the bikes running far to rich at low throttle openings and far to lean on wider throttle openings.

Starting to get disheartened, help?
1955 Plunger Golden Flash (doesn't work)
1967-2005  Enfield Bullet bitsa (evil)
Absence of common sense or car to go with it.

Online Triton Thrasher

  • Scotland
  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 2004
  • Karma: 23
Re: Carb conundrum
« Reply #12 on: 30.12. 2011 21:34 »
If it's weak at full throttle, even with a grossly oversized main jet, I'd suspect a fuel flow restriction, somewhere between the tank breather and the main jet.  What's the biggest jet you've tried?

Richness at small throttle openings is probably a worn needle jet (am I right in assuming you're not using a new one yet?), or throttle slide cutaway too small.


Offline wilko

  • Resident Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 681
  • Karma: 4
Re: Carb conundrum
« Reply #13 on: 30.12. 2011 22:54 »
Do you have a choke?

Offline GoldenFailure

  • Moving Up
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 33
  • Karma: 0
  • Wales
Re: Carb conundrum
« Reply #14 on: 30.12. 2011 23:26 »
Yep, have an air slide, down when starting, up when running.

You are right, guilty of cheapness and just bought the needle, figured that if it got a little closer, I'd cough up the cash for other bits.

Surely a worn needle jet wouldn't affect very small throttle openings?

I hadn't thought of fuel flow problems, theres plenty coming out of the tap, (with pipe disconnected) the pipes clear so there no blockage, BUT, I did mess about with the brass float needle seat as the carb was overflowing dramatically when tickled, so I drifted the seat up to lower the float bowl cut off. I tried to do it the bare minimum, but maybe I've lowed the fuel level too much. Would that cause such dramatic lean running?

And, theres two fuel taps, but one isn't connected to the carb, does an a10 need both taps open for full throttle running? surely not?

If it is a fuel flow problem, wouldn't it die after a mile or so, only to regain power after letting off the throttle for a few seconds?

Again, thanks for all the advice.
1955 Plunger Golden Flash (doesn't work)
1967-2005  Enfield Bullet bitsa (evil)
Absence of common sense or car to go with it.