Author Topic: Mikuni or Amal?  (Read 4169 times)

phread

  • Guest
Mikuni or Amal?
« on: 26.05. 2006 05:29 »
So I have recently acquired a 1952 A10 that has a Mikuni carb installed.  I'm just starting to sort the bike out but
I'm debating as to whether or not I should replace it with the correct Amal 276.  I'm not in any rush to do so, but
at some point I'm going to do a complete restoration. 

So what type of experiences have people had with the Amal 276?

Cheers,

Phread

Offline Caretaker

  • Making things work !
  • Administrator
  • Valued Contributor
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 478
  • Karma: 30
Re: Mikuni or Amal?
« Reply #1 on: 26.05. 2006 17:40 »
Hi, can only say that a 276 in good shape, properly jetted & no leaks works very good, at least for me, & I like the looks of the 276. But a worn 276 is a source of all sorts of problems, f.ex. watch your float level and float needle etc, catching fire is a possibility (the magneto is directly underneath). In this context a mikuni is a security item, at a price of lost originality.

Regards
Erling
"Sometimes I say things that are so highly intelligent that I do not understand a word of it"

Allan

  • Guest
Re: Mikuni or Amal?
« Reply #2 on: 04.06. 2006 16:19 »
I have found the 276  no problem but i must admit the fire risk is there,as both of my BSA's like to be "tickled " to start, so suggest a drip shoot be added to get the excess fuel away from the magneto

Online Joolstacho

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 1184
  • Karma: 7
Re: Mikuni or Amal?
« Reply #3 on: 30.01. 2010 11:19 »
Can anyone advise on Mikuni jet sizes, settings etc for a Super Rocket?
I have one off a japanese trailbike that is very close in size for my bike.

The bike's a bitser... built from bits, for riding, so originality not an issue.
Compared with a Mono or concentric, a Mikuni is thing of real wonderous beauty! No rattly scored, sticky slide made of dogmetal etc!

-Jools

Online chaterlea25

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 4118
  • Karma: 54
Re: Mikuni or Amal?
« Reply #4 on: 30.01. 2010 17:41 »
Hi Jools,
I have a Mikuni on my Super Rocket and have only praise for it
Theres a bit more than jets involved in the transplant you are considering!!
There are a miriad of Mikuni needles emulsion tubes and so forth not to mention slide cutaway to select
I would suggest contacting Allens the Mikuni dealers if you are in the UK.  01949 836733
or Sudco Mikuni in California, http://www.sudco.com/mikuni.html

HTH
John O R
1961 Super Rocket
1963 RGS (ongoing)

Richard

  • Guest
Re: Mikuni or Amal?
« Reply #5 on: 30.01. 2010 20:12 »
I must agree with chaterlea25 I fitted the mikuni to my 61 s/r purchased from Allens and it is superb,with only one small problem which I will sort out sometime, and that is when it has been stood idle for some time I have to blow up one of the breather pipes to get the fuel flowing, apart from that the response is soooo much different than an amal, I will not be putting the amal back on
Richard

Offline rocket man

  • Valued Contributor
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 466
  • Karma: 2
Re: Mikuni or Amal?
« Reply #6 on: 30.01. 2010 20:15 »
hi i have a 389 brand new from surrey cycles had no probs
ticks over nicely i think for looks the amal looks better i had a mikuni
and i didn't like the look of it like an add-on part there also made a lot better than they where
in the good old days and fit a drip shield much safer

dave