Jase. Maybe of interest and for comparison here are Plunger and S/A Cush parts to show the confusion that can arise and scope for mis-matched parts. In all cases the crank nut bears directly onto the drive sleeve when tightened down.
S/A on left, Plunger on the right. First picture shows Cush lift available on S/A as the distance from end of the drive sleeve to the end of the sliding member, here its 8mm. Parts from 1957 A7. Cush bottoms on flat face of the big nut. Plunger slider and drive sleeve are more or less level. Cush lift here is the length of the extended nose on the nut 67 2054. Using a S/A flat face nut will lock this drive solid.
Second picture shows the difference in depth between the two cush members. S/A Tip on lobe to base is 30mm in this example, Plunger it's 38mm. S/A cush will fit plunger splines, but not vice versa, and here the depth of engagement is marginal as the spline depths are different and is a possible source of too much lift if the wrong part has been used on a Plunger.
S/A Slider lobes do not fit easily into the duplex sprocket face, so another tell tale sign of the wrong part. Also the ramp profiles are different and the cam action is poor.
Then to add to confusion, three variants of the Plunger Drive Sleeve.
L to R... Pre oilseal crankcase. Sleeve with scroll edge.
Pre oilseal crankcase. Sleeve with plain edge. Both are 46mm diam.
Oilseal type, Sleeve has plain edge to run on the seal. 43mm diam.
Finally the drive sleeves compared. S/A is shortest, this design application uses a separate spacer to run on the seal, and is splined along whole length. Plunger ones all have a cutaway to the outer splines, centre example here is a bit blued.....
Swarfy.
PS, Looked for a Plunger Nut. Cupboard bare.