That is a very interesting and rare bike. The following is my opinion and may be a bit contentious! I was in the process of restoring one of these about ten years ago and gave up with it and sold it on. When I was rebuilding the engine I came to the view that the original design and construction was very poor. The lubrication system seemed inadequate and certain aspects of design and construction seemed very weak. Generally, the crankshaft, conrods, cam and followers all seemed to be flawed for various reasons. The lubrication of the cam and followers was particularly poor and, in the very early models the valve gear relied on mist, but this can be upgraded. The reasons BSA discontinued the bike after only four years of production would, I guess, be largely due to the mechanical and design issues I've mentioned. The engine introduced in 1950, i.e. the 'shortstroke' A7 and A10 is far superior and will give many miles of trouble-free pleasure if built properly. However, the bike you have identified is rare and deserves to be given a chance. If you buy it and restore it, you will have a rare bike that gets a lot of attention. If you intend to do some longish runs and use the bike regularly you may look elsewhere or buy something in addition. There are a number of people on this forum who own 'longstrokes' and I dare say I've already offended them so I apologise. BSA, who had a policy of producing the same model in various forms for extended periods of time, dropped the 'longstroke' after only four years of production, probably for good reason. Sorry!