I don't get the negativity. Why shouldn't a new BSA do what Triumph have done? I see many modern Triumphs on UK roads.
The proposal to ban petrol vehicles in the UK does not, (at the moment) include motorcycles.
The reports I have heard used the terms domestic vehicles which would include motorcycles but exclude trucks.
The only reason not to ban motorcycles would be if the police & ambos can;t find a suitable electric bike.
Because Triumph did it 20 years ago when people at least still remembered the name .
Because Triumphs are made in Tailand not in the UK where you either have to make a Rolls Royce class of bike ( priced accordingly ) or 10,000 a week to cover costs .
Enfield have been on the verge of going under to 20 of the last 30 years and they have the advantage of a large home market.
A modern BSA will have to be tier IV compliant so will need to be fuel injected so will idle at 1200 rpm and run like a sewing machine which is basically the same as every other motorcycle and not what the few who do remember what the old BSA's were will be expecting.
BEcause the market for motor vehicles is declining particularly in the youth group because they "hang out" on their phones & not at the "Ace " on their motorcycle .
If you were going to revive a name from the past the one to pick would be Nimbus for no other reason than 3 billion people have read all the Harry Potter books and will at least recognise the the name Nimbus and associate it with a moving object .
Remember all the Whoo har about the "new Ariel " a few years back ?
and how many times have we seen the revival of Norton ?
Motorcycling is dieing weather we like it or not.
Much like cars, computer designs have lead to aerodynamically efficient, quiet cars that really all look the same, all go the same .