From my time setting car timing belts, failure was due more commonly from insufficient tension than overtightening. Usual failure presented was missing teeth. The broken belts were from foreign matter eg a stone trapped....run with no cover, or high milers, driven hard by leadfoots, belt never changed.
The drive is transmitted by the force of the belt against the pulleys, not the teeth, which serve solely for location. Insufficient tension puts more lateral drive force on the teeth, which shear off. Much too tight meant whining noises, and alternator and water pump bearing failures over time.
My take is the belt tension needs to be more on the tight side, and while the 90 degree rule is a good start I'd make it a tightish 90, rather than a loose one. Difficult to describe as experience tells what's right. No guidance from the maker? There is always good old YouTube as a looky how others do it.
Try rotating the rear wheel (in gear) to tension the lower run, then remove as much slack as shows in the top run as an initial setting. You may find the tension varies with a hot motor, so a bit of suck it and see may be in order. It has to be a compromise. Too tight loads gearbox sleeve gear bearings. Too loose risks losing teeth. A good tension is when the belt runs smoothly between the pulleys, with no sign of whip as the throttle is blipped.
The sliding plate can remain as a way of keeping road grit etc out of the primary case.
Swarfy.