As one with no experience of different clutches on given bikes, I can't help but wonder what difference I would note between my 6-spring s/a clutch (adjusted quite well, I believe) and other available types. Somehow, I am confused why a $1000 AU (491 GBP) clutch could be so much better than a 260 GBP 4-spring clutch from SRM or, even, my very inexpensive 6-spring, which seems to do everything I want.
As the expression goes here, can somebody "talk me down?"
Richard L.
Richard,
The reason Ive been using a belt drive on my last 2 bikes for the last 10 years is ,
a) both bikes needed new clutches,
b)once set up you never have to adjust them as the belt doesnt stretch.
c) I run them dry so that eiminates a potential oil leak .
d) runs much quieter than standard with no clatter from the l/h side.
e) The kits I use (Tony Hayward ). use friction material that allows you to back off the springs .In conjunction with a nylon lined clutch cable you get 2 finger operation which is very pleasant and impresses other bike owners no end.
f) Apparently ,(and Im not sure about this one),a belt absorbs less power than a chain .
Mike