Author Topic: Have a look at the best Norton I have ever seen ( Just listed on ebay )  (Read 983 times)

Offline A10 JWO

  • Resident Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 730
  • Karma: 2
Just listed, Bremont V4 Norton on ebay. I cannot post the pictures, but please look.

Offline Greybeard

  • Jack of all trades; master of none.
  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 9982
  • Karma: 50
Greybeard (Neil)
2023 Gold Star
Supporter of THE DISTINGUISHED GENTLEMAN'S RIDE https://www.gentlemansride.com

Warwickshire UK


A Distinguished Gentleman Riding his 1955 Plunger Golden Flash

Offline RoyC

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2017
  • Posts: 1179
  • Karma: 10
My bike is a 1958 A7SS
Staffordshire UK

Online chaterlea25

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 4130
  • Karma: 54
Hi All,
Jeez he is only selling his booking place in the queue for the bike?
and wants to make £10500 from the process *razz* *razz*

John

1961 Super Rocket
1963 RGS (ongoing)


Offline worntorn

  • Valued Contributor
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 396
  • Karma: 3
They need to figure out how to build an engine that will run. Six years in and the problems keep coming. Norton management seems to leave the owners to figure it out for themselves.
Straighten crank, replace broken balance shaft bearing , fix seized rockers etc at 2500 miles? And that's a partial list from one bike.

Online Black Sheep

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2017
  • Posts: 1221
  • Karma: 8
    • Where black sheep live
Don't like it.
2 twins, 2 singles, lots of sheep

Offline Sluggo

  • Serial Hoarder, or Eccentric Collector depending on viewpoint
  • Resident Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2017
  • Posts: 654
  • Karma: 11
They need to figure out how to build an engine that will run. Six years in and the problems keep coming. Norton management seems to leave the owners to figure it out for themselves.
Straighten crank, replace broken balance shaft bearing , fix seized rockers etc at 2500 miles? And that's a partial list from one bike.

Glen, While that is true (Bushmans engine) It is also an isolated case.  Other Norton 961s have done just fine.
Just like vintage BSAs-Triumphs and even 1975 850 Nortons there are batches of good ones and then batches of bad ones.  If you looked at the total instead of specific cases you can draw much different conclusions.  Sure, its upsetting to purchase a new machines or in Bushmans case, a lightly used bike with low mileage, BUT at half the retail price (He readily admits to getting a deal) and having such problems.  But Modern Triumphs have had well publicized problems, And no shortage of other makes & models such as Ducati, BMW, and even Harley.

Also, apples and oranges as the V4 is a completely different platform and not fair to compare the 2 directly.
Or should we say the Ariel sq4 is exactly like an Ariel leader and thus not worthy of ownership?,, Or, a more personal metaphor, when Vincent built the worlds worst publicity generator which was the Vincent watercraft which caught fire and sank in front of the press should we call out Rapides, Shadows and Comets as equal rubbish best found at the bottom of a river or lake?

I agree that Norton UK could & should do better by its customers, and have spoke personally to Stuart on this topic as well as exhorted him to clone the Cootes and their outstanding work to improve the brand and support to dealers and owners, but its a struggling enterprise few people ever expected to last, let alone grow.  So, in my opinion,Its history repeating itself and Modern Nortons are flawed just like the originals but overall they are an outstanding machine with passionate owners and supporters who find ways to fix their flaws and quirks. 

So, I am a proud Norton owner as well as a proud BSA owner but i have no illusions about them and if someone wants Honda reliability they should just buy a Honda, 

Norton (& BSA & Triumph) Making ordinary men into mechanics.   Ride-wrench & repeat.
Remember that any advice received on a free internet forum is generally worth about 1/2 of what you paid for it.
We overcharge every 3rd customer to pass the savings onto you.
You can have High Quality, Low price, and fast turnaround. Pick any 2, Never all 3 at the same time.

Offline jachenbach

  • Resident Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 564
  • Karma: 8
Obviously, I haven't ridden it, so can't judge how good it really is. As to appearance, it could be any Japanese sportbike with a Norton label and I wouldn't know the difference.Just personal taste, but I prefer to be able to see the mechanical bits.

Offline worntorn

  • Valued Contributor
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 396
  • Karma: 3
Sluggo, I have followed the 961 forum closely since it started, in fact I was one of those who supported its creation. There are all kinds of 961s with big problems. Bushman has taken his apart to figure out what was causing all of the noise and vibration. Most owners are not capable of this, so they ride them as is or until something lets go.
There are also many electrical problems causing non-start, stall etc. And then there is the oil in the airbox issue.

The comparison to modern Triumphs is not in favour of the 961. You just get on the Triumph and ride, forget about wrenching. Change oil, change tires, ride and repeat. It almost feels wrong after a few years.

John Bloor said when he started that they would overengineer the bikes rather than produce problematic machines. He knew that the company wouldn't survive a lemon model.
There are all kinds of early Hinckley Triumphs still running around having done huge mileage with very little trouble. The AC Bonnies routinely run over 100k miles without difficulty. The Triples might be even stronger. So no comparison, or at least not one that would be helpful to Norton.
The  Vincent motorcycle / Amanda Water Scooter analogy is an apples to hand grenades analogy.
Vincent had already proven themselves as a more than competent builder of motorcycles. In 1948, they built the first production vehicle of any type capable of 150 mph.  It was ten years later when Mercedes managed to do the same with a car, the first on 4 wheels to do so.

Vincent completed the 1 year, 100,000 mile all-weather Tony Rose road test and other durability tests.
They set many speed records and still hold  records ( unfaired motorcycle, 216 mph) .
 
Along the way there were many " World's firsts" including the rear suspension design patented in 1926 ( and copied by Yamaha in 1980)
There wasn't much left to prove.
So , being an inventor, Phil Vincent invented and patented the world's first personal water scooter. Some development might be expected. The basic concept was good,  modern versions are plentiful.
So the Amanda was an invention, the very first machine of its kind.
In 2010, when the first 961 appeared, it was not the first motorcycle. It was not an invention.
We had mountains of knowledge from more than a century of development and the construction of millions upon millions of motorcycles, including Vincents.
Im not aware of a single " World's first" or " World's Only" on the Norton 961.
Its just a fairly standard, relatively low performance, very nice looking motorcycle trying to fill a niche market. It uses many standard parts built by others ( Ohlins, Brembo, etc)

What's clearly missing is quality control.


I'm hopeful that Norton will pull it together, but they seem to have forgotten the 961 and the 961 owners. Or perhaps they know that there is no easy fix.
The latest bikes do seem to have fewer problems than the pre- 2016 bikes ( but still oil in airbox on some?), so there is some progress.
So Norton, while you are on to the next great thing, don't forget the 961 and the owners who plunked down their hard-earned in good faith!
BTW, Sluggo, I greatly enjoy your posts, tons of good info in them.

Glen

Offline hdawson

  • A's Good Friend
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2016
  • Posts: 108
  • Karma: 0
Beauty before brains I suppose. ;)
When I first saw this model I thought - if only!*loveit*
I thought it was the best looking bike after my MV750 that I sold because it was akin to being on a rack!!
Surely the target market have money burning holes...
Caveat emptor and I would still love to have one to look at in the stable and to ride for about 20 minutes at a time  *lol*

61 BSA Super Rocket (cafe).
51 Matchless G9 Clubman.
81 Suzuki GSX 750 ES.
02 Triumph Sprint.