I've spent considerable time
not getting the oil tank on my 1963 A10 RGS to fit. I bought this bike dismantled some years ago and it's being assembled for the first time in my hands.
This topic follows on from the one
https://www.a7a10.net/forum/index.php?topic=13533.0and it's worth reading that as it has some good content, though it didn't conclude with a clear outcome.
The lower of the two oil pipes connecting to the oil tank, the Feed-to-engine one, has had the nut on the union rubbing on the frame, which of course it shouldn't. On the frame, where this nut and the one above goes, the frame has quite deep etchings (say between 1 and 2mm) from where both nuts have chafed in the past. See the first photo
If I try and tilt the tank to get clearance between the oil union nuts and the other part of the frame tube, the seam at the top of the oil tank touches the underside of the frame tube above it and stops the oil pipe nut from moving away from the frame tube.
Another oil tank when fitted provides just enough top tube clearance to allow the tank to tilt, but then the fixing at the front of the tank is too high to marry up with the hole in the lug that is attached to the side of the battery tray mount (by at least 1/4 inch). (If you've followed all that you're doing well
)
I
could use that tank but it's not been repainted, while the one I'm trying to fit I have resprayed and put transfers on, so I am still trying to fit that.
I have wondered about opening up the hole in the rear upper mounting as that could alow the tank to be re-aligned but so far have desisted in case there is knowledge in the forum that would render doing this unnecesary.
I have access to a 1955 B31 with the flat sided oil tank and toolbox, and the feed pipes to the oil tank have a nice clearance of about 1/4 inch. It's not obvious why this is so, but it is infuriating!
Here's a photo of the B31. It needs a bit of interpreting, but the clearance is there.
Chaterlea25 mentioned on the older thread that some changes in bracket positioning may be the cause of this problem. I've been through my my parts lists (a 1956 on and a 1962 one but couldn't find any different parts being used, so could it be a case of the design of a particular part being changed? I'd be very interested to know solutions to this problem.
Cheers, Jon