Author Topic: Long stroke engineering  (Read 556 times)

Offline fido

  • Ferdinandovac, Croatia
  • Resident Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2006
  • Posts: 712
  • Karma: 9
Long stroke engineering
« on: 20.06. 2023 15:18 »
I really like the design of the longstroke engine. Everything seems nicely engineered. I have wondered why they changed it so much for the later engines, cost cutting perhaps?

Offline Brandis

  • A's Good Friend
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2022
  • Posts: 190
  • Karma: 1
Re: Long stroke engineering
« Reply #1 on: 20.06. 2023 20:15 »
I believe they went to short stroke when everyone else did.  New metalurgy allowed exhaust valves to run at a higher temp. Short stroke gave more power for the same weight and displacement. 
One of the smart guys on the Forum will know better than I.

And, you must have a long stroke made after they sorted out the lubrication issue.
47 A7

Offline muskrat

  • Global Moderator
  • Wise & Enlightened
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 11046
  • Karma: 132
  • Lithgow NSW Oz
    • Shoalhaven Classic Motorcycle Club Inc
Re: Long stroke engineering
« Reply #2 on: 20.06. 2023 20:51 »
G'day Fido.
I think! (sometimes) *whistle*
When BSA went for the larger displacement A10 they corrected any (well most) of the flaws of the Long stroke. To keep manufacturing costs down the A7 was also re-designed so most of the parts were interchangeable, crank case, cams, followers, timing gears etc.
Cheers
'51 A7 plunger, '57 A7SS racer now a A10CR, '78 XT500, '83 CB1100F, 88 HD FXST, 2000 CBR929RR ex Honda Australia Superbike .
Australia
Muskys Plunger A7