Author Topic: unknown Rearframe  (Read 204 times)

Online jelo68

  • Active
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2023
  • Posts: 8
  • Karma: 0
unknown Rearframe
« on: 11.12. 2024 20:51 »
Moin together,
i have an Plungerrearfame with a unknown Partnumber . It should be 67-4094 but on this Frame is something like 67-4156???
I cant read it clear.
Does someone know more?
Unfortunately someone cuts the Footrestholder so I must build an Chopper *smile*
North Germany 55 A10 plunger

Online limeyrob

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2023
  • Posts: 1037
  • Karma: 4
Re: unknown Rearframe
« Reply #1 on: 11.12. 2024 22:16 »
Many years ago I had a rigid frame with the foot rest mounts saw off.  I seem to recall welding something on.  Could you get some turned up and welded to the lugs?
Slough 59 GF/SR

Online chaterlea25

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 4156
  • Karma: 54
Re: unknown Rearframe
« Reply #2 on: 12.12. 2024 09:46 »
Hi All,
That number is probably the raw casting number for the welded on lug ?

John
1961 Super Rocket
1963 RGS (ongoing)

Offline Swarfcut

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2018
  • Posts: 2399
  • Karma: 57
Re: unknown Rearframe
« Reply #3 on: 12.12. 2024 10:39 »
 With such a diverse range of parts manufactured in house or by contract, keeping some common system of model identity for parts was a must. You will all be familiar with the two digit prefix for parts in the early days, 67 notably for our A rigids and plungers, 42 for later S/A variants, where newer or modified components were used. 68 for later unit models. Earlier parts used on later ranges still carry on with the original part number, so the system can appear confusing.

 So I'd agree with CJ, but once fitted this marking could be ground off, and I don't think I have seen a frame with this mark remaining. As with anything, there are times in the industrial process were rogue bits get past the QC inspector and the norm may not be what you expect.

 Came across a cut off frame stand lug with 90 prefix. This turned out to be from a Bantam, and was moved on to another happy sufferer......

 A pity the existing frame has lost its taper fittings foot the footrests. I have one exactly the same, but view it as a challenge to improve the design and get some use rather than worry about trying to replicate the original fixings.

 Swarfy.

Online jelo68

  • Active
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2023
  • Posts: 8
  • Karma: 0
Re: unknown Rearframe
« Reply #4 on: 13.12. 2024 16:29 »
Yes i know that it can be weldet but the one Guy i know who can do that says 300€ -so I decide there is no need for original Footrests. When the Time comes for this Frame  it will get an front or rearset also is the Frontframe in someones Garage.*smile*
North Germany 55 A10 plunger