14 thou is not a lot and i would not say design issue after all bsa were not expecting 60 years of use, these are new problems coming to light with age not quality
regards
I would agree with you except for this bike has not been kicked over in a serious way since 1971, thats the last time the bike ran. At that time the PO decided to build a chopper, got as far as taking it completely apart and then stopped.
So really, its 13 years of use.
Its an easy enough fix for me to bore out the cover and just make the right size bushings. It just seems odd to me that the hole in the cover where the bushing fits would be worn that far out of round. The only other thing is if it was made badly in the first place, thats why I asked if this was a common problem or if once again the odd-ball wear on this bike is completely unique.
Some weird observations. The frame is completely straight, yet the rear wheel hub had been fixed twice. I can tell this because one guy knew how to braze and the other didnt.
One cylinder bore (both on standard size) was warn 10 thousandths more than the other. I dont think the bike saw many miles, yet the sludge trap was plugged tight.
The headstock bearings were completely worn out and even grooved the cups, yet the lower sliders are like brand new inside.
The covers that came with the bike were in good shape, but the transmission main shaft was cracked.
and on and on with the weird wear.
Its almost like someone bought the bike, never changed oil or did any kind of maintenance and just ran it until it would not go anymore. But that does not explain the rear hub, worn out bearings in the headstock, or stuff like the bushing hole being worn to the point a correct bushing would just fall out AND never having been rebuilt and still on standard big ends and barrels
Back when I started all this I made sure the frame and the engine left the factory together, so I have pretty much ruled out massive accident just because of the frame being so good.
Lee