« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: I think Triumph are missing out on a trick...  (Read 801 times)

Offline tombeau

  • Resident Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 678
  • Karma: 6
I think Triumph are missing out on a trick...
« on: 29.09. 2013 10:50 »
by not producing something like this themselves. A small, lightweight, useable and cheap bike, with good looks. They ought to have an entry level Tiger Cub in their range.
http://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C438278
Logged

Offline Derby Rob

  • A's Good Friend
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2013
  • Posts: 117
  • Karma: 0
Re: I think Triumph are missing out on a trick...
« Reply #1 on: 29.09. 2013 11:29 »
looks nice,could do with high level pipe though i think
Logged
61 BSA A7,yamaha rd500 ,suzuki ts250er,suzuki x7,1958 francis barnett cruiser 80

Offline a10 gf

  • Global Moderator
  • Wise & Enlightened
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 3230
  • Karma: 57
  • West Coast, Norway & Alpes Maritimes, France
    • A10 GF
Re: I think Triumph are missing out on a trick...
« Reply #2 on: 29.09. 2013 13:43 »
Nice idea. Yes, high pipe (+ a smaller front tire) and it'll look nice.

But calling it a Triumph may be a problem or misleading, ref. Hinckley.
Quote
Category:    Motorcycles
Make:    Triumph
Year:    2013
Logged


Stand with
A10 GF '53 My A10 website
"Success only gets you a ticket to a much more difficult task"

Online Triton Thrasher

  • Scotland
  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 1996
  • Karma: 23
Re: I think Triumph are missing out on a trick...
« Reply #3 on: 29.09. 2013 15:51 »
Is it a Chinese 125 with the mudguards chopped and different tyres fitted, "by people who love, live and breath motorcycles?"
Logged

Offline tombeau

  • Resident Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 678
  • Karma: 6
Re: I think Triumph are missing out on a trick...
« Reply #4 on: 29.09. 2013 18:23 »
 *smile*
You're right there TT, there are things I don't like about it, but things I do.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »