On a related subject,
Has anyone measured the density of the typical crud removed from the sludge trap.? You know - weight and volume of the dry crud. Otherwise anyone hazard a guess.?? Or the typical mixture of metal, atmospheric dust (silica and alumina?), carbon (carbon black may be similar?) Hardened oil,? Just ballpark numbers would do.
I had my crank balanced many years ago before the internet and this Forum, when I also had no idea what 70% meant. I recently checked the receipt, and it does say 70% BF. That number sounded good at the time.
After enquiring whether the workshop had removed it for cleaning, "No we blew it out with compressed air". So I removed and cleaned it. It was more than half full. It had clearly been blown out with compressed air, but the remaining crud was dry and hard, having been idle for some 15 or so years.
On calculating my balance factor yesterday (with clean sludge trap), I got a BF of 55.4 using same pistons, rings, rods, gudgeons & circlips.
I think there was sufficient crud in the trap to explain the difference. My spreadsheet suggested that about 80 grams would explain it. I measured 30 mls capacity of the sludge trap, but the density or SG of the crud would be helpful in making sure I am on the money. It will be much higher than the SG of oil no doubt.
On the positive side, the bike has done 80 miles since re-commissioning, and had been running smoothly up to about 60mph, so I am relieved that it wasn't cleaned first before balancing. My new pistons are lighter, so calculate a new BF of about 58.7, which is about where I think I want it.?
Hopefully I will be well-armed to talk to my new engineering shop about what to do.
Cheers
Col